The Skills of the Actor
I recently spent two full days working intensively with a client on the basics of acting. We broke the training down into the elements that I feel are necessary for an actor to excel in and habituate, it is the craft, it is our craft:
* Discerning from the script what is actable and what clues from the script should be acted upon.
* Harvesting from the script clues to the given imaginary circumstances.
* The capacity to work off your scene partner, to act and react, within the truth of the moment.
* Technical skils of voice, movement, an understanding of performing ‘style’, and the professional skills necessary to act for stage, television, film and new media.
* Lastly the ability to connect to the script and the situation of the character.
Of course, I appreciate that traditional actor training has more components and if I taught a full course, it would certainly include more, but it wouldn’t include anything to do with character, because it’s unnecessary.
I don’t say that to be controversial. I don’t say that because I am not aware of character based training, I have trained in many of them and read the books of their master practitioners, I don’t say that ‘cos Mamet says so’, but because my experience, and this week’s work demonstrates that truthful, engaging, captivating performance can be delivered without it.
And as my intensive student goes off to Los Angeles to work with his agent on adding more acting work to his career, I feel confident that he takes with him, the seeds of the professional skills his acting career will need to blossom.
2 Comments to The Skills of the Actor
Hi Mark. I would agree with you on these … interesting that two of your five points have to do with script analysis and a passing reference again to script in #5. I’m delighted to see that you include technical skills, which, in some training classes are are often bypassed or at least given less attention than is character-based work.
Hurrah for your posts, and this is no exception for you adress issues that are seldom mentioned in teaching (or any were else, for all that matters). By the way, the kind of acting you talk about (and surely practice in your coaching), I´ve seen in lithuanian Eimuntas Nekrosius and australian Ranters Theatre plays. Live, reacting, enigmatic and allways moving. Cheers
Search
Recent Posts
- The Layers of Performance
- Playwrights You Should Read
- Being Off Book
- Top Books on Acting
- Excerpt from An Interview with Mark Westbrook
- A Handy Guide to Acting Emotions with Steven Seagal
- Method Acting and Practical Aesthetics: What’s the Difference?
- Preparation
- The Beauty of Truth
- The Other
- Just Say the Lines
- Illusion
- Rehearsal: A Demonstration of Excess and Waste
- The Final Curtain
- An Essential Lesson
Popular Posts
- 10 Reasons I HATE Method Acting (but NOT Method Actors) (612)
- Some Great Suggested Audition Monologues from NIDA (552)
- Nudity on Stage and Screen (474)
- The Facts of Acting (422)
- What questions will they ask me at my Drama School interview? (369)
- Contrasting Monologues for Auditions (368)
- Tongue Twister for T and TH sounds (303)
- Betrayal (237)
- Give Me Three Days (236)
- Deliberate Practice (233)
08/01/2010